Skip to main content

Panel

Strange bedfellows, indeed: How the impact of the current political moment could accelerate an open science future

17 September 2025| 11:00
81/R-003C - Science Gateway Auditorium A

Moderator

Sara Rouhi

#DefendResearch
Sara Rouhi has worked in scholarly publishing – scholarly societies, publishers, and software providers – since 2008. Having completed her undergraduate and graduate work in political science and political theory, she brings a social science lens to the challenges of building an open science future in a shifting socio-political landscape. Her scholarly publishing work primarily focuses on making access to knowledge creation as sustainably open as possible by exploring partnership and non-traditional business models to enable greater participation in knowledge creation. In February 2025 she joined with Lisa Schiff, Catherine Mitchell, Alice Meadows, and Peter Suber as a co-author of the Declaration to Defend Research Against US Government Censorship. The DefendResearch.org group is dedicated to educating the public on the dangers of censorship in science. The website includes testimonials from researchers, toolkits for lobbying and educating in local communities, and resources around data rescue and cataloging of public statements/positions that #DefendResearch against government attack. Follow the team @DefendResearch.bsky.social and Sara, herself, @RouhiRoo.bsky.social on Bluesky.

Open Science in Turbulent Times: Co-Opted or Catalyzed?

Amid political attacks on science in the US, Open Science finds itself championed for unexpected reasons. Is this a co-optation, or a catalyst for global change? Join a provocative panel exploring how shifting power dynamics, funding priorities, and ideologies are reshaping the future of international research, openness, and scientific integrity.


The current US government attacks on science and international collaboration are shaking the foundations of the global scientific endeavor. The damage to both research itself and the essential underpinnings of good science – collaboration, integrity, openness – may be irreversible.

US government acts of censorship, intimidation and erasure – like the removal of critical websites, discontinuation of vital data collection, and proliferation of conspiracy theories and debunked research – would lead the casual observer to assume the administration was anti-science at its core, and open science, itself, would be anathema. However, open science advocates within the administration – including the current NIH Director, Jay Bhattacharya – are viewing openness in a different light. They argue open practices will keep the government and scientific community accountable, reducing group think and enabling greater freedom for inquiry.

So, where does this leave open science globally, given the reduction in US research funding and the EU/UK commitment to increasing support (and poaching) those researchers? Does the shift in emphasis by the current Administration still move us collectively toward a more open future that achieves similar goals, just under different motivations? How are funders, research institutions and researchers themselves thinking about the global scientific endeavor in this new world? Is the open science movement being co-opted? Join this panel of experts – researchers, practitioners, and open science advocates – for a robust debate on the strange bedfellows pushing for open science policies in this new world.

Panelists

Christopher Marcum

Open Science Advocate and Senior Fellow at the Center for Data Policy, Data Foundation
Dr. Marcum is an Open Science Advocate and Senior Fellow at the Data Foundation Center for Data Policy. His portfolio focuses on data access, science and information policy, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. Immediately, prior to his current role, Dr. Marcum served as Senior Statistician and Senior Scientist in the Office of the Chief Statistician of the United States at the White House Office of Management and Budget, where he was also the Senior Advisor to the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers and the staff lead on matters related to scientific integrity and research security. Dr. Marcum also served in the Biden-Harris Administration as the Assistant Director for Open Science and Data Policy in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Dr. Marcum oversaw transformative science policies in his OSTP portfolio that led to the 2022 OSTP Public Access Memo, the 2023 Federal Scientific Integrity Framework, and the White House declaring the 2023 as a Year of Open Science. Dr. Marcum received his Ph.D. in sociology from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) in 2011. He also has a Master’s degree in demographic and social analysis from UCI and completed a post-doctoral fellowship in economics and statistics at the RAND Corporation. After his formal training, he joined the intramural research faculty of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a staff scientist and methodologist where his research focused on social networks and health. Eventually, he moved into science policy at the NIH and was appointed to be the Genomic Program Administrator and chair of the Data Access Committee at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). His professional accolades include over fifty scientific publications, a commendation of exceptional service from OSTP, two Special Act or Service Award honors from NIAID, a Matilda White Rile Early Stage Investigator Honor from the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research at the NIH, two GREAT Awards from the NHGRI, an Order of Merit Award from the University of California-Irvine, and two On-the-Spot Awards and an Achievement Award from the Office of Management and Budget. He is a fellow of the Gerontological Society of America, nominated by his peers for his research, training, and advocacy on issues related to aging and the life course.

Dan Rudmann

Open science librarian
Dan Rudmann is a librarian at Utrecht University focused on institution reform and culture change through open science and community organising. He developed the Utrecht Digital Competency Center, rethinking collaboration, professionalization, and recognition for research support staff throughout the university, and manages the Open Science Community Utrecht to empower researchers seeking alternative forms of university practices.

George Cooper

Doctoral Researcher
George Cooper is a scholarly publishing professional and researcher. George has worked in publishing for over ten years, managing and developing publications and open research platforms in health sciences, global development, communication studies, cultural heritage and anthropology. George has PhD in Information Studies from University College London, having just completed a 6-year project on the censorship of online research journals in China.

Michael Anne Kyle

Assistant Professor, Dept of Medical Ethics and Health Policy